So why don’t I just leave it at a scale of 0-10? Why good man, thank you for asking!
10: I would pay for this at competitive market price.9: I often would select this over a paid plug-in of decent repute, OR a 7/8 with a really good GUI or some other very unique feature.7-8: Good with some unique feature, great GUI or other area of excellence.Whether it’s a 4, 5 or 6 depends largely on the GUI. 2-3: There might be a redeeming quality that is rarely useful, but mostly garbage tier.I may give a full point of ‘1’ if it seems like they put in some semblance of thought in to the concept. 0-1: Garbage Tier plug-in that almost always does more harm than good.First I start out with my rough rating on a piece of paper on a scale of 0-10. These are my subjective evaluations of these products, but the ratings are not random. There’s going to be arbitrary ratings of ‘78’ or ‘33’ instead of ‘30’ or ‘80’. So hang on tight! (and please read the ‘Rating’ section first!)ġ-100? Great. So now I’m going to review the included audio effects in the latest from Steinberg: Cubase 9 Pro.
In a close second Place are the Digital Performer series. The Studio One Effects Review and Studio One Instruments Review appear to have been one of the more popular posts on my blog according to analytics.